Counter Arguments to the Ex-gay Movement
Some people claim that the efforts of the ex-gay movement are ineffective or even harmful.
The claims by the ex-gay movement have been disputed by some psychological,
psychiatric, and medical associations. Because of the differences of opinion
between many scientific and religious views on what homosexuality is, and
whether people should try to change it, establishing a dialogue between the two
groups is difficult. The ex-gay movement views homosexuality as a behavior (a
sin), while the pro-gay movement often views it as a genetic trait.
Individuals who align themselves with the ex-gay movement generally believe that
same-sex feelings mask underlying
emotional and developmental issues that need resolution. Many claim to have
diminished or eliminated their same-sex attractions, put behind their former gay life,
and happily married and reared children. Many
say that their same-sex erotic feelings were rooted in abuse or neglect in early
development; others had no history of abuse, but for whatever reason did not
fulfill their emotional needs with others of the same gender. The process of
healing from these issues took time, but they no longer identify themselves as
gay. Critics say that those who claim to have changed are at best suppressing
true gay feelings, or at worst living a double life.
There are few scientifically rigorous studies that have evaluated the lasting
impact of ex-gay efforts on sexual preference or behavior. Some believe that
attempts to change one's sexuality are potentially harmful, sometimes leading to
depression, anxiety, or suicide, yet no studies exist
here either. However, the testimonies of individuals who have overcome same-sex
attraction have played an important role in the political debate in recent
years.
For more reading, see
 | Counters by professional associations. |
| Are ex-gay organizations failing? |